Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
| dc.contributor.author | Capdevila, Jaume | |
| dc.contributor.author | Grande, Enrique | |
| dc.contributor.author | García-Carbonero, Rocio | |
| dc.contributor.author | Simo, Marc | |
| dc.contributor.author | del-Olmo-García, Ma-Isabel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jiménez-Fonseca, Paula | |
| dc.contributor.author | Carmona-Bayonas, Alberto | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pubul, Virginia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-19T15:37:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-19T15:37:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-04-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Capdevila J, Grande E, García-Carbonero R, Simó M, Del Olmo-García MI, Jiménez-Fonseca P, et al. Position Statement on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Response Evaluation to Systemic Therapies of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, With a Special Focus on Radioligand Therapy. The Oncologist. 5 de abril de 2022;27(4):e328-39. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1083-7159 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/21327 | |
| dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide a guidance for the management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nominal group and Delphi techniques were used. A steering committee of 8 experts reviewed the current management of NETs, identified controversies and gaps, critically analyzed the available evidence, and formulated several guiding statements for clinicians. Subsequently, a panel of 26 experts, was selected to test agreement with the statements through 2 Delphi rounds. Items were scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 = totally agree to 4 = totally disagree. The agreement was considered if ?75% of answers pertained to Categories 1 and 2 (consensus with the agreement) or Categories 3 and 4 (consensus with the disagreement). RESULTS: Overall, 132 statements were proposed, which incorporated the following areas: (1) overarching principles; (2) progression and treatment response criteria; (3) advanced gastro-enteric NETs; (4) advanced pancreatic NETs; (5) advanced NETs in other locations; (6) re-treatment with radioligand therapy (RLT); (7) neoadjuvant therapy. After 2 Delphi rounds, only 4 statements lacked a clear consensus. RLT was not only recommended in the sequencing of different NETs but also as neoadjuvant treatment, while several indications for retreatment with RLT were also established. CONCLUSION: This document sought to pull together the experts' attitudes when dealing with different clinical scenarios of patients suffering from NETs, with RLT having a specific role where evidence-based data are limited. | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | OXFORD UNIV PRESS | |
| dc.rights | Atribución/Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject.mesh | Consensus | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis/radiotherapy | |
| dc.title | Position Statement on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Response Evaluation to Systemic Therapies of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, With a Special Focus on Radioligand Therapy | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 35380724 | |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://academic.oup.com/oncolo/article/27/4/e328/6543669 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/oncolo/oyab041 | |
| dc.journal.title | Oncologist | |
| dc.identifier.essn | 1549-490X |