Repositorio Dspace

Contrast-enhanced CT in sepsis: insights from a European Emergency Radiology survey

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Stahl, Ann-Christine
dc.contributor.author Rubarth, Kerstin
dc.contributor.author Opper-Hernando, María-Isabel
dc.contributor.author Frisch, Anne
dc.contributor.author Blanco-Barrio, Ana
dc.contributor.author Basilico, Raffaella
dc.contributor.author Miele, Vittorio
dc.contributor.author Iacobellis, Francesca
dc.contributor.author Bolanaki, Myrto
dc.contributor.author Witham, Denis
dc.contributor.author Dewey, Marc
dc.contributor.author Pohlan, Julián
dc.date.accessioned 2026-04-20T09:43:49Z
dc.date.available 2026-04-20T09:43:49Z
dc.date.issued 2026-01-26
dc.identifier.citation Stahl AC, Rubarth K, Opper Hernando MI, Frisch A, Blanco-Barrio A, Basilico R, et al. Contrast-enhanced CT in sepsis: insights from a European Emergency Radiology survey. Eur Radiol. 26 de enero de 2026. doi:10.1007/s00330-025-12256-y
dc.identifier.issn 0938-7994
dc.identifier.uri https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/25925
dc.description.abstract Objectives To gain insight into emergency radiologists' views on the role of contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in sepsis management. Materials and methods This analysis of a survey distributed in 2023 to members of the European Society of Emergency Radiology (ESER) (n = 297) gathered perspectives on the role of CECT in patients with sepsis. The previously validated questionnaire used for this survey encompassed demographic information, clinical experience, and inquiries regarding the timing and rationale for CT. Results were compared with data from a prior single-center survey among clinicians and general radiologists. Responses were collected anonymously and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. As not all items were mandatory, item-specific response numbers may vary and are reported accordingly throughout the manuscript. Results A total of 144 emergency radiologists participated, with most of them endorsing a 1-6-h timeframe for CECT after the diagnosis of sepsis (45.8%; n = 27/59). However, a notable proportion accepted longer intervals > 12 h (35.6%; n = 21/59). Emergency radiologists particularly opted for repeat imaging in patients with sepsis and clinical deterioration (35.3%; 24/68), whereas clinicians tended to be more hesitant (2.9%; n = 10/341). Conclusion The results of this survey indicate strong agreement among emergency radiologists on the relevance of prompt CECT for the timely diagnostic management of patients with sepsis. Several aspects related to timing and indication show significant interdisciplinary differences, requiring further study.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher SPRINGERNATURE
dc.rights Atribución/Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es *
dc.title Contrast-enhanced CT in sepsis: insights from a European Emergency Radiology survey
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.pmid 41586846
dc.relation.publisherversion https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-025-12256-y
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00330-025-12256-y
dc.journal.title European Radiology
dc.identifier.essn 1432-1084


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución/Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución/Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta