Repositorio Dspace

Efficacy of Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Nd:YAG lasers for caries removal: A systematic review

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Sae-Ferrandez, Olivia
dc.contributor.author Pecci-Lloret, María-Pilar
dc.contributor.author García-Ríos, Paula
dc.contributor.author Pérez-Guzmán, Nuria
dc.date.accessioned 2026-03-10T11:55:49Z
dc.date.available 2026-03-10T11:55:49Z
dc.date.issued 2026-01
dc.identifier.citation Sae-Ferrández O, Pecci-Lloret MP, García-Ríos P, Pérez-Guzmán N. Efficacy of Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Nd:YAG lasers for caries removal: A systematic review. Journal of Dentistry. enero de 2026;164:106264. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106264
dc.identifier.issn 0300-5712
dc.identifier.uri https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/25362
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Laser technology is increasingly used in dentistry due to its minimally invasive properties. Among its applications, caries removal has gained attention. The most frequently used lasers in this context are Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, and Er,Cr:YSGG. AIM: To systematically evaluate the efficacy, treatment efficiency, and histological outcomes of different lasers used for caries removal in comparison with conventional methods. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted on December 1, 2024, and updated on December 5, 2024, in the databases Medline, Scopus, SciELO, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library. In vivo and in vitro studies assessing Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG lasers for caries removal were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I V2 tools. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria (five in vitro and six in vivo). Most studies reported thar Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers achieved effective caries removal, selective ablation of infected dentin and favorable histologlical features (open dentinal tubules, absence of smear layer). Nd:YAG showed lower ablation efficiency and was mainly effective for surface modification. Laser treatment generally required longer time than rotary excavation but caused less pain and anxiety in clinical studies. Heterogeneity among studies prevented meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Erbium lasers, particularly Er:YAG, appear effective and conservative for caries removal, supporting their use within minimally invasive dentistry. However, due to methodological variability, limited evidence for Er,Cr:YSGG and Nd:YAG, and lack of long-term outcomes, further well-designed randomized trials are needed. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Laser-assisted caries removal represents a promising alternative to conventional methods, especially for patients with high dental anxiety or requiring minimally invasive procedures.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.rights Atribución/Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinDerivados 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject.mesh Humans
dc.subject.mesh Dental Caries/surgery/therapy
dc.subject.mesh Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use
dc.subject.mesh Dental Cavity Preparation/methods/instrumentation
dc.subject.mesh Laser Therapy/methods
dc.subject.mesh Treatment Outcome
dc.title Efficacy of Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Nd:YAG lasers for caries removal: A systematic review
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.pmid 41285306
dc.relation.publisherversion https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300571225007079
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106264
dc.journal.title Journal of Dentistry
dc.identifier.essn 1879-176X


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución/Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinDerivados 4.0 Internacional Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución/Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinDerivados 4.0 Internacional

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta