Repositorio Dspace

Scaffolds for pulp revitalisation: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Pecci-Lloret, María-Pilar
dc.contributor.author Nandin-Muttoni, Gianna
dc.contributor.author Guerrero-Gironés, Julia
dc.date.accessioned 2025-12-03T10:46:39Z
dc.date.available 2025-12-03T10:46:39Z
dc.date.issued 2022-08
dc.identifier.citation Pecci-Lloret MP, Nandin-Muttoni G, Pecci-Lloret MR, Guerrero-Gironés J, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ. Scaffolds for pulp revitalisation: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger. agosto de 2022;243:151936.
dc.identifier.issn 0940-9602
dc.identifier.uri https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/22860
dc.description.abstract AIMS: The main objective of this systematic review is to carry out a qualitative synthesis of the available bibliography on the use of scaffolds used in dentistry for the revitalisation treatment of immature teeth with open apex. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The search was carried out in the MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases. The search included the terms 'Pulp regeneration' OR 'Pulp revitalisation' AND 'scaffold'. The inclusion criteria were articles published in English, which carry out revitalisation treatments, with analysis of the results obtained and comparison of them, carried out in humans, in immature permanent teeth with open apex, and randomised clinical trials. The risk of bias assessment was performed with the RoB2 guideline. RESULTS: Of 769 studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria. The scaffolds used were blood clot, platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, and blood clots combined with different membranes such as collagen membrane, collagen membrane and placentrex, chitosan membrane and hydrogel with basic growth factor for fibroblasts. The clinical success rate is excellent for all scaffolds used. The best scaffold for root development is platelet-rich plasma and it is the scaffold with the highest percentage of response to vitality test. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that platelet-rich plasma is the preferred scaffold of choice, although all the scaffolds analysed have acceptable results.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher ELSEVIER GMBH
dc.rights Atribución/Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinDerivados 4.0 Internacional 
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 *
dc.subject.mesh Collagen
dc.subject.mesh Dental Pulp
dc.subject.mesh Humans
dc.subject.mesh Platelet-Rich Fibrin
dc.subject.mesh Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subject.mesh Regeneration/physiology
dc.title Scaffolds for pulp revitalisation: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.pmid 35367348
dc.relation.publisherversion https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0940960222000516
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.aanat.2022.151936
dc.journal.title Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger
dc.identifier.essn 1618-0402


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución/Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinDerivados 4.0 Internacional  Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución/Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinDerivados 4.0 Internacional 

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta