Repositorio Dspace

Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Muedra, Paula
dc.contributor.author Forner, Leopoldo
dc.contributor.author Lozano, Adrián
dc.contributor.author Sanz, José-Luis
dc.contributor.author Rodríguez-Lozano, Francisco-Javier
dc.contributor.author Guerrero-Gironés, Julia
dc.contributor.author Riccitiello, Francesco
dc.contributor.author Spagnuolo, Gianrico
dc.contributor.author Llena, Carmen
dc.date.accessioned 2025-11-18T12:52:27Z
dc.date.available 2025-11-18T12:52:27Z
dc.date.issued 2021-02
dc.identifier.citation Muedra P, Forner L, Lozano A, Sanz JL, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Guerrero-Gironés J, et al. Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration. Materials. 31 de enero de 2021;14(3):659.
dc.identifier.uri https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/21044
dc.description.abstract Dentinal tubule penetration influences root canal treatment sealing. The aim of this study was to compare dentinal penetration of two clinical presentations of silicate-based sealers using confocal laser. Sixty single-rooted human teeth from 50-70 year-old patients extracted for orthodontic/periodontal reasons were used. Canals were prepared using Mtwo system up to 35/0.04, with 5.25% NaOCl irrigation and final irrigation using 17% EDTA. Teeth were randomly assigned into study groups (n(i) = 20): EndoSequence BC sealer (ES, group 1), BioRoot RCS (BR, group 2); and a control group (n(c) = 20) with AH Plus (AHP). Root canals were obturated with 35/0.04 gutta-percha (single-cone technique). The samples were obtained from apical, middle, and coronal thirds. Dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage of penetration around the canal perimeter were measured. The statistical analysis was performed using Mann Whitney U test and Wilcoxon t-test (95% confidence interval). ES exhibited a significantly higher penetration than AHP in apical and middle thirds (p < 0.05), and in middle and coronal thirds relative to BR (p < 0.05). The percentage of penetration around the canal perimeter was significantly higher for ES compared to BR in all thirds, but only in the apical third for AHP (p < 0.05). The pre-mixed silicate-based sealer exhibited better penetration than the powder/liquid one.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher MDPI
dc.rights Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ *
dc.title Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.pmid 33572611
dc.relation.publisherversion https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/3/659
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/ma14030659
dc.journal.title Materials
dc.identifier.essn 1996-1944


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta