Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
| dc.contributor.author | Queissert, Fabian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rourke, Keith | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schoenburg, Sandra | |
| dc.contributor.author | Giammo, Alessandro | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gonsior, Andreas | |
| dc.contributor.author | González-Enguita, Carmen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Romero, Antonio | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schrader, Andrés-J | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cruz, Francisco | |
| dc.contributor.author | Martins, Francisco-E | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dorado, Juan-F | |
| dc.contributor.author | Angulo, Javier-C | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-18T12:47:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-18T12:47:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Queissert F, Rourke K, Schönburg S, Giammò A, Gonsior A, González-Enguita C, et al. ATOMS (Adjustable Transobturator Male System) Is an Effective and Safe Second-Line Treatment Option for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence after Implantation of an AdVance/AdVance XP Fixed Male Sling? A Multicenter Cohort Analysis. JCM. 24 de diciembre de 2021;11(1):81. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/20926 | |
| dc.description.abstract | (1) Background: This study examined outcomes of second-line ATOMS implantation after failure of the fixed male sling (FMS) AdVance/AdVance XP. (2) Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort analysis was carried out in men implanted with an ATOMS between 2011 and 2020 after failure of an AdVance/AdVance XP. Success was assessed on the basis of objective (dryness, 0-1 pad/24 h or >20 g/24 h pad test) and subjective results (PGI-I). We performed the Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher's exact test, logistic regression, and multivariate analysis. (3) Results: The study included 88 patients from 9 centers with a mean age of 71.3 years. No Clavien-Dindo > II complications occurred within the first 3 months after ATOMS implantation. A total of 10 cases (9%) required revision in the ensuing clinical course. After a mean follow-up of 42.5 months, 76.1% achieved social continence, and 56.8% used no pads at all. Mean urine leakage/24 h dropped from 422 g (3.9 pads) to 38 g (0.69 pads) and the mean ICIQ-SF decreased from 16.25 to 5.3 (p < 0.0001). PROMs (patient-reported outcome measures) showed improvement in 98.9% of cases, and 63.6% gave a "very much better" PGI-I rating. Multivariate analysis identified a lower probability of achieving maximum satisfaction for the following factors: the AdVance XP as first-line therapy (OR 0.35), a lower ICIQ-SF question 1 (OR 0.26), status post-irradiation (OR 0.14), and more severe pain prior to ATOMS implantation (OR 0.51). (4) Conclusions: Implantation of an ATOMS is an effective and safe second-line treatment option for recurrent urinary incontinence after implantation of an AdVance/AdVance XP sling. High patient satisfaction was demonstrated in a long-term follow-up. | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ | * |
| dc.title | ATOMS (Adjustable Transobturator Male System) Is an Effective and Safe Second-Line Treatment Option for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence after Implantation of an AdVance/AdVance XP Fixed Male Sling? A Multicenter Cohort Analysis | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 35011821 | |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/1/81 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/jcm11010081 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Clinical Medicine | |
| dc.identifier.essn | 2077-0383 |