Repositorio Dspace

EVALUACIÓN CUALITATIVA DE UN PROCESO PARTICIPATIVO DE ADAPTACIÓN DE UNA GUÍA DE PROMOCIÓN DE LA SALUD

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Martínez, María-Jesús-Calvo
dc.contributor.author Peralta, Elena-Ruiz
dc.contributor.author Cassetti, Viola
dc.contributor.author Díaz, Blanca-Botello
dc.contributor.author Botalla, Rosa-Magallón
dc.contributor.author Moreno, Cruz-Bartolomé
dc.contributor.author Torroja, Mario-Soler
dc.contributor.author Paz, Marta-Sastre
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-06T10:41:50Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-06T10:41:50Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Calvo Martínez MJ, Ruiz Peralta E, Cassetti V, Botello Díaz B, Magallón Botalla R, Bartolomé Moreno C, et al. [Qualitative evaluation of a participatory process of adaptation of a health promotion guide.]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 17 de junio de 2021;95:e202106097.
dc.identifier.issn 2173-9110
dc.identifier.uri https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/18830
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVE: In the last decades, in Spain, the interest shown towards community participation in health has been growing. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines to promote community participation in health. For this reason, between 2017 and 2018 the AdaptA GPS project was carried out through 10 working groups from 10 autonomous communities, to adapt the NG44 community participation guide in health from the NICE institute in the United Kingdom to the Spanish context. The objective of this article was to evaluate the adaptation process (the aspects to be improved and the resulting learning) of the AdaptA GPS project through the evaluation of its participants. METHODS: A qualitative evaluation was carried out through two questionnaires with open-ended questions, self-administered in each working group, one by the group coordinator and one by the whole working group (between 6 and 10 people per group), and the answers were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified that reflect the perspectives of the participants about the adaptation process: positive factors (participatory methodology, collaborative work and diversity of participants), aspects that could be improved (scarce people's participation and lack of funding) and acquired learning (working in network and the importance of promoting research in this field). CONCLUSIONS: The AdaptA GPS project was an innovative project that favored the creation of networks and synergies, fostering co-production thanks to its participatory approach, which has laid the foundations for future collaborative processes of community engagement.
dc.language.iso spa
dc.publisher Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo
dc.rights Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 España
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es *
dc.subject.mesh Community Participation
dc.subject.mesh Health Promotion/organization & administration
dc.subject.mesh Humans
dc.subject.mesh Qualitative Research
dc.subject.mesh Spain
dc.title EVALUACIÓN CUALITATIVA DE UN PROCESO PARTICIPATIVO DE ADAPTACIÓN DE UNA GUÍA DE PROMOCIÓN DE LA SALUD
dc.title.alternative Qualitative evaluation of a participatory process of adaptation of a health promotion guide
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.pmid 34135301
dc.relation.publisherversion https://ojs.sanidad.gob.es/index.php/resp/article/view/617
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.journal.title Revista Espanola de Salud Publica
dc.identifier.essn 1135-5727


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 España Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 España

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta