Repositorio Dspace

Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Benefits and Challenges

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Guillén-Aguinaga, Laura
dc.contributor.author Rayon-Valpuesta, Esperanza
dc.contributor.author Guillén-Aguinaga, Sara
dc.contributor.author Rodríguez-Díaz, Blanca
dc.contributor.author Montejo, Rocío
dc.contributor.author Alas-Brun, Rosa
dc.contributor.author Aguinaga-Ontoso, Enrique
dc.contributor.author Onambele, Luc
dc.contributor.author Guillén-Aguinaga, Miriam
dc.contributor.author Guillén-Grima, Francisco
dc.contributor.author Aguinaga-Ontoso, Inés
dc.date.accessioned 2026-03-09T08:44:01Z
dc.date.available 2026-03-09T08:44:01Z
dc.date.issued 2025-04-22
dc.identifier.citation Guillen-Aguinaga L, Rayón-Valpuesta E, Guillen-Aguinaga S, Rodriguez-Diaz B, Montejo R, Alas-Brun R, et al. Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Benefits and Challenges. Nursing Reports. 22 de abril de 2025;15(5):137. doi:10.3390/nursrep15050137
dc.identifier.issn 2039-439X
dc.identifier.uri https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/25149
dc.description.abstract Background: Nursing Schools are incorporating Mixed Reality (MR) into student training to enable them to confront challenging or infrequently encountered scenarios in their practice and ensure their preparedness. This systematic review evaluates the benefits and challenges of implementing MR in nursing curricula. Materials and Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed, WOS, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published between 2011 and 2023. The search strategy used was "(nurses OR nurse OR nursing) AND mixed reality AND simulation". Inclusion criteria required that studies focus on undergraduate nursing students and be written in English or Spanish. Exclusion criteria included reviews, bibliometric studies, and articles that did not separately report undergraduate nursing student results. Quality was evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies with control groups to compare MR's effectiveness against traditional teaching methods. Results: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. MR was widely used to improve clinical judgment, patient safety, technical skill acquisition, and student confidence. The meta-analysis found that MR reduced anxiety (Cohen's d = -0.73, p < 0.001). However, its impact on knowledge acquisition and skill development was inconsistent. There was no improvement over traditional methods (p = 0.466 and p = 0.840). Despite positive qualitative findings, methodological variability, small sample sizes, and publication bias contributed to mixed quantitative results. The main challenges were cybersickness, usability, high costs, and limited institutional access to MR technology. Conclusions: Although MR can help nursing education by decreasing students' anxiety, its efficacy remains inconclusive. Future research should use larger, randomized controlled trials to validate MR's role in nursing education.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher MDPI
dc.rights Atribución/Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
dc.title Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Benefits and Challenges
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.pmid 40423171
dc.relation.publisherversion https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/15/5/137
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/nursrep15050137
dc.journal.title Nursing Reports
dc.identifier.essn 2039-4403


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución/Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución/Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta