Repositorio Dspace

Machine learning to predict major bleeding during anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: possibilities and limitations

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Mora, Damián
dc.contributor.author Mateo, Jorge
dc.contributor.author Nieto, José-A
dc.contributor.author Bikdeli, Behnood
dc.contributor.author Yamashita, Yugo
dc.contributor.author Barco, Stefano
dc.contributor.author Jiménez, David
dc.contributor.author Demelo-Rodríguez, Pablo
dc.contributor.author Rosa, Vladimir
dc.contributor.author Yoo, Hugo-Hyung-Bok
dc.contributor.author Sadeghipour, Parham
dc.contributor.author Monreal, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned 2025-11-19T15:37:13Z
dc.date.available 2025-11-19T15:37:13Z
dc.date.issued 2023-06
dc.identifier.citation Mora D, Mateo J, Nieto JA, Bikdeli B, Yamashita Y, Barco S, et al. Machine learning to predict major bleeding during anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: possibilities and limitations. Br J Haematol. junio de 2023;201(5):971-81.
dc.identifier.issn 0007-1048
dc.identifier.uri https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/21309
dc.description.abstract Predictive tools for major bleeding (MB) using machine learning (ML) might be advantageous over traditional methods. We used data from the Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) to develop ML algorithms to identify patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) at increased risk of MB during the first 3 months of anticoagulation. A total of 55 baseline variables were used as predictors. New data prospectively collected from the RIETE were used for further validation. The RIETE and VTE-BLEED scores were used for comparisons. External validation was performed with the COMMAND-VTE database. Learning was carried out with data from 49 587 patients, of whom 873 (1.8%) had MB. The best performing ML method was XGBoost. In the prospective validation cohort the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and F1 score were: 33.2%, 93%, 10%, and 15.4% respectively. F1 value for the RIETE and VTE-BLEED scores were 8.6% and 6.4% respectively. In the external validation cohort the metrics were 10.3%, 87.6%, 3.5% and 5.2% respectively. In that cohort, the F1 value for the RIETE score was 17.3% and for the VTE-BLEED score 9.75%. The performance of the XGBoost algorithm was better than that from the RIETE and VTE-BLEED scores only in the prospective validation cohort, but not in the external validation cohort.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher WILEY
dc.rights Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es *
dc.subject.mesh Humans
dc.subject.mesh Venous Thromboembolism/etiology
dc.subject.mesh Registries
dc.subject.mesh Hemorrhage/chemically induced/complications
dc.subject.mesh Predictive Value of Tests
dc.subject.mesh Anticoagulants/adverse effects
dc.subject.mesh Pulmonary Embolism/complications
dc.title Machine learning to predict major bleeding during anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: possibilities and limitations
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.pmid 36942630
dc.relation.publisherversion https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.18737
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/bjh.18737
dc.journal.title British Journal of Haematology
dc.identifier.essn 1365-2141


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta