<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>02.10.01. Investigación y comunicación científica</title>
<link>https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/17886</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:59:08 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T16:59:08Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Evaluation of advanced life support training through virtual reality: A cross-sectional observational study in a hypothermia and helicopter evacuation scenario</title>
<link>https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/25954</link>
<description>Evaluation of advanced life support training through virtual reality: A cross-sectional observational study in a hypothermia and helicopter evacuation scenario
Sánchez-Gómez, Marina; López-López, Carmen-Amalia; Greif, Robert; Semeraro, Federico; Ocampo-Cervantes, Ana-Belén; Pons-Claramonte, Manuel; Nieto-Caballero, Sergio; Alcázar-Artero, Petronila-Mireia; Pardo-Ríos, Manuel; Guillén-Martínez, Daniel
To evaluate clinical performance and user perception after advanced life support training through immersive virtual reality (VR) simulation, focused on decision-making in a hypothermia scenario involving a helicopter evacuation. Cross-sectional observational study with an analytical component. Update Course on Ultrasound and Emergencies organized by the semFYC, held in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria from February 6 to 8, 2025. 101 healthcare professionals who fully completed the simulation experience and assessment questionnaires. Immersive VR clinical simulation using a 360 degrees video recorded at a ski station, presented through Meta Quest 3 (R) headsets. The scenario included 16 clinical decisions related to the management of a hypothermic patient during air transport. Percentage of correct clinical decisions, subjective perception (satisfaction, realism, confidence), and system usability assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The mean score for correct decisions was 69.4% (SD = 15.2). Participants rated the experience very positively, highlighting realism (8.87/10), training usefulness (M &gt; 4.7/5), and increased clinical confidence. The mean SUS score was 76.7, indicating "good" usability. A lower performance was identified in specific advanced hypothermia decision-making items. Immersive VR simulation proved to be a feasible, well-accepted, and useful strategy for training in clinical decision-making in complex, low-frequency scenarios. The results support its integration as a complementary tool in continuing emergency training programs.
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/25954</guid>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scoping review of the evolution of delirium detection, diagnostic, and severity assessment scales</title>
<link>https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/25913</link>
<description>Scoping review of the evolution of delirium detection, diagnostic, and severity assessment scales
Alonso-Crespo, David; Rodríguez-Mondéjar, Juan-José; Leal-Costa, César
Aim/Objective: To systematically compile and analyze all delirium detection tools, establishing a temporal and contextual framework to clarify current knowledge. Background: Delirium is a prevalent condition in hospitalized patients, particularly older adults, associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden. Early diagnosis is essential for timely intervention. Despite the development of numerous diagnostic tools over five decades, existing resources remain fragmented, necessitating a comprehensive synthesis. Methods: A scoping review was conducted across six databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cuiden, LILACS, CINAHL, Web of Science) following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: Nearly 100 delirium detection tools were identified and categorized into five comparative tables, providing a structured overview of key features. Conclusions: This review consolidates dispersed information, presenting a comprehensive timeline of delirium assessment tools. Findings support clinical practice and research by offering an updated, structured perspective on available screening and diagnostic methods. (c) 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/25913</guid>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Learners' Perspectives on Interprofessional Simulation and Co-Debriefing: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study</title>
<link>https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/25677</link>
<description>Learners' Perspectives on Interprofessional Simulation and Co-Debriefing: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study
Díaz-Agea, José-Luis; Ros-Romero, Álvaro; Leal-Costa, César; Segura-López, Gabriel; Cayuela-Fuentes, Pedro-Simón; Vera-Pérez, José-Antonio; Canovas-Pallares, Juan-Manuel; Pinero-Zapata, Manuel; Cinesi-Gómez, César; Adánez-Martínez, Gracia; Pujalte-Jesús, María-José
INTRODUCTION: Interprofessional simulation enhances both technical and nontechnical skills among healthcare professionals, improving their clinical practice. Co-debriefing, where two facilitators lead debriefing sessions, is a common approach in these trainings. This study aims to assess educational aspects of interprofessional simulation and co-debriefing in postgraduate medical and emergency nursing students. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study with a mixed-methods approach was conducted among postgraduate students (n = 46). A mixed-methods design was used, combining quantitative questionnaire data with qualitative content analysis of open-ended responses, allowing integration of numerical trends with in-depth learner perspectives. A valid and reliable ad hoc questionnaire was designed, and qualitative content analysis was used to examine participants' free-text responses. RESULTS: Students' perceptions were evaluated across six dimensions: applicability, satisfaction, motivation, safe environment, organization, and co-debriefing. Significant differences were found between medical and nursing students in all dimensions except applicability and organization. Overall, students rated interdisciplinary sessions and co-debriefing positively, though nurses highlighted areas for improvement, such as icebreaker activities, more dynamic simulations, and equal representation of both professions. CONCLUSIONS: While interprofessional simulation and co-debriefing were well received, participants-especially nurses-identified areas for enhancement to ensure a more balanced and engaging learning experience. By integrating quantitative outcomes with qualitative insights, the study highlights when co-debriefing adds value in interprofessional simulation and when single-facilitator approaches may be sufficient.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/25677</guid>
<dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Meta-health: a national swot analysis for the development of a metaverse and virtual reality in health sciences education</title>
<link>https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/25394</link>
<description>Meta-health: a national swot analysis for the development of a metaverse and virtual reality in health sciences education
Pardo-Ríos, Manuel; López-López, C-A; Delgado, R-Castro; Morales-Moreno, I; Martínez, D-Guillen; López-Guardiola, P; Melendreras-Ruiz, R; Mendoza-López, M; López-Ayuso, MB; Greif, R; Nogueron, G-Gijon; Nicolás-Carrillo, A
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/25394</guid>
<dc:date>2025-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
