<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>03.01. Investigación y comunicación científica</title>
<link href="https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/17804" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/17804</id>
<updated>2026-05-26T19:10:57Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T19:10:57Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Uso del término "preembrión" en la literatura biomédica desde su origen hasta la actualidad</title>
<link href="https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/26532" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ferrer-Colomer, Modesto</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Pastor, Luis-Miguel</name>
</author>
<id>https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/26532</id>
<updated>2026-05-13T11:04:53Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Uso del término "preembrión" en la literatura biomédica desde su origen hasta la actualidad
Ferrer-Colomer, Modesto; Pastor, Luis-Miguel
In this article, we present a review about the use of the term "preembryo" in the scientific literature as well as Bioethics from its origin, back in June 1979, to the end of the year 2014. We analyze their evolution along the time comparing with other terms commonly used in embryology. Also, we show the relevant journals in which this term appears, (offering the impact index within their specific field), and the authors who use it the most. The term "preembryo" arose in the scientific literature in 1979, remaining for about 6 years without reappearing in the scientific literature. Then, after an increase of articles, that covers the 90's decade, began to decrease its use without having disappeared altogether. Our study also shows that the use of the word "preembryo" has not increased with the passage of time; on the contrary, it is becoming less used in the biomedical literature. This does not occur with other terms that name the embryo before implantation, which have not ceased to increase during these years, both referring to the human species and other animal species. Finally, the term "pre-embryo" appears very little in journals related to the reproduction biology area, but it does so in obstetrics and gynecology, where many articles on assisted reproduction are published. Our findings suggest that, instead of replacing classical embryological terms, the word "preembryo" does not seem to affect the use of them. Likewise, this word has a hypertrophied use in humans without an apparent reason, which would support the artificial nature of this term. Finally, the term "pre-embryo" appears very little in journals of reproduction biology area, but it does so in obstetrics and gynecology, where many articles on assisted reproduction are published. In conclusion, instead of substituting classical embryological terms, the word "pre-embryo" does not seem to affect the use of them and in the current discussions about the human condition of the embryo this term is no longer used.
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Nota del editor: la maternidad, su valor y sentido como núcleo del debate bioético sobre la maternidad subrogada</title>
<link href="https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/26526" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Pastor, Luis-Miguel</name>
</author>
<id>https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/26526</id>
<updated>2026-05-13T11:04:53Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Nota del editor: la maternidad, su valor y sentido como núcleo del debate bioético sobre la maternidad subrogada
Pastor, Luis-Miguel
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Importancia de la autorregulación: análisis de la actividad de la comisión de ética y deontología médica en Córdoba</title>
<link href="https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/26519" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Beltran-Aroca, Cristina-M</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Girela-lopez, Eloy</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Sáez-rodriguez, Jose</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Pérez-Cárceles, María-Dolores</name>
</author>
<id>https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/26519</id>
<updated>2026-05-13T11:04:49Z</updated>
<published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Importancia de la autorregulación: análisis de la actividad de la comisión de ética y deontología médica en Córdoba
Beltran-Aroca, Cristina-M; Girela-lopez, Eloy; Sáez-rodriguez, Jose; Pérez-Cárceles, María-Dolores
OBJECTIVE: to analyse the activity of the Medical Ethics and Deontology Commission (MEDC) of the College of Physicians of Cordoba regarding conflictive situations in the profession from 2013 through 2021. MATERIAL AND METHODS: cross-sectional observational study, in which 83 cases of complaints submitted to the College were collected. RESULTS: the incidence was 2.6 complaints? members/year, with a total of 92 doctors reported. 61.4% were submitted by the patient, 92.8% of which were addressed to a single doctor. 30.1% were in the speciality of family medicine, 50.6% in the public sector and 72% in outpatient care. In 37.7% the chapter of the Code of Medical Ethics concerned was chapter IV (quality of medical care). In 89.2% of cases the parties came to make a statement, with a higher risk of disciplinary proceedings being observed when the statement was both, oral and written (OR:4.61; p=0.026). The median resolution time was 63 days, significantly longer in cases proposed for disciplinary proceedings (146 days vs. 58.50 days; OR:1.01; p=0.008). The MEDC found 15.7% (n=13) to be in breach of ethics, with 15 doctors being disciplined (16.3%) and 4 sanctioned (26.7%) with a warning and temporary suspension from practice. CONCLUSIONS: The role of the MEDC is fundamental in the self-regulation of professional practice. Inappropriate behaviour during patient care or between colleagues has serious ethical implications, disciplinary repercussions for the physician, and it particularly undermines patients' trust in the medical profession.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>La aplicación de la tecnociencia al hombre: discernimiento ético en relación con la propuesta transhumanistaposthumanista</title>
<link href="https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/26517" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Pastor, Luis-Miguel</name>
</author>
<id>https://sms.carm.es/ricsmur/handle/123456789/26517</id>
<updated>2026-05-13T11:04:49Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">La aplicación de la tecnociencia al hombre: discernimiento ético en relación con la propuesta transhumanistaposthumanista
Pastor, Luis-Miguel
Transhumanism-posthumanism is a current of thought that appears closely linked to the development of technoscience and its application to man. At the same time that this current must be subject to criticism, an anthropological and ethical paradigm must be illuminated that allows accepting or not the new technoscientific advances, making a discernment between them. Such discernment should lead us to weigh the goodness of these advances, rejecting only those that represent a degradation of the human being, and accepting those that help man to be more fully man. To do this, the article proposes starting the discernment from an ethical principle such as respect for the integrity of man. Together with him, it is necessary to act with caution regarding human health, considered in relation to his psychosomatic unity. It will also be necessary to avoid deriving the ethics of the advances from the same technoscience. Finally, discernment requires, ultimately, starting from an idea about what man is, proposing the need to do so from a dual rather than dualistic conception of the human person. Based on all of the above, various ethical criteria are indicated in the work that complete the principle of respect for human integrity indicated above: respect and promote human life in all its dimensions, use of technology at the service of human beings in a controlled manner and that report social benefit or value by each technique, not only from a therapeutic perspective, but also from the improvement of the human psychosomatic unit. In conclusion, it is necessary to recognize in man the uniqueness of him as he is a bodily being who knows and loves in freedom, whose ends are not limited to material or sensible things, but which are only achievable in and from his own material condition. Consequently, any techno-scientific intervention that substantially alters his body condition is inhuman, not instead when it repairs or enhances -without abolishing them- his own qualities.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
